<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 933 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331549</link>
    <description>Pipes used as casing pipes in water supply schemes are described as eligible for exemption where the notification covers pipes needed for delivery of water to a treatment plant and storage facility and the required certificate from the Collector or District Magistrate is produced. The text states that the notification should be read purposively so its object of facilitating water treatment plants is not defeated by a narrow distinction between pipes directly carrying water and casing pipes used within the same supply chain. The accompanying CBEC circular is noted as supporting exemption for pipes required to obtain untreated water from the source to the plant, and the denial of benefit is said to be unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 933 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331549</link>
      <description>Pipes used as casing pipes in water supply schemes are described as eligible for exemption where the notification covers pipes needed for delivery of water to a treatment plant and storage facility and the required certificate from the Collector or District Magistrate is produced. The text states that the notification should be read purposively so its object of facilitating water treatment plants is not defeated by a narrow distinction between pipes directly carrying water and casing pipes used within the same supply chain. The accompanying CBEC circular is noted as supporting exemption for pipes required to obtain untreated water from the source to the plant, and the denial of benefit is said to be unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>