<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 134 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4583</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, remanded a case involving duty liability on capital goods and raw materials under the Exim Policy and Customs Act. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand on capital goods but upheld it on unused raw materials. It determined that the depreciated value for duty payment should be calculated from the date of commercial production to the date of clearance on payment of duty, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Penalty imposition on the assessee company and its director was rejected due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to establish collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 134 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4583</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, remanded a case involving duty liability on capital goods and raw materials under the Exim Policy and Customs Act. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand on capital goods but upheld it on unused raw materials. It determined that the depreciated value for duty payment should be calculated from the date of commercial production to the date of clearance on payment of duty, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Penalty imposition on the assessee company and its director was rejected due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to establish collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>