<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 925 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for incorrectly classifying imported goods as &#039;Medicaments&#039; instead of &#039;Food Supplements&#039;. The Tribunal found that the CHA had exercised due diligence by paying duty on the declared goods, and the complexity of classification primarily fell under the Customs Department&#039;s responsibility. Citing a previous decision where a similar penalty was overturned, the Tribunal concluded that penalizing the CHA was unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the CHA, setting aside the penalty and disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 925 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for incorrectly classifying imported goods as &#039;Medicaments&#039; instead of &#039;Food Supplements&#039;. The Tribunal found that the CHA had exercised due diligence by paying duty on the declared goods, and the complexity of classification primarily fell under the Customs Department&#039;s responsibility. Citing a previous decision where a similar penalty was overturned, the Tribunal concluded that penalizing the CHA was unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the CHA, setting aside the penalty and disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>