<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185743</link>
    <description>A landlord&#039;s bona fide requirement under rent control law depends on a present, sincere and genuine need, assessed on a practical review of the facts rather than earlier pleading imperfections alone. The Court accepted the landlady&#039;s need to shift for medical treatment and family use, and held that the permitted amendment of pleadings had to be considered on its merits with the supporting evidence. It also upheld the findings that comparative hardship favoured the landlord and that partial eviction was not a workable solution on the record. The eviction decree was restored, with limited time granted to the tenant to vacate on undertaking and compliance with rent obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185743</link>
      <description>A landlord&#039;s bona fide requirement under rent control law depends on a present, sincere and genuine need, assessed on a practical review of the facts rather than earlier pleading imperfections alone. The Court accepted the landlady&#039;s need to shift for medical treatment and family use, and held that the permitted amendment of pleadings had to be considered on its merits with the supporting evidence. It also upheld the findings that comparative hardship favoured the landlord and that partial eviction was not a workable solution on the record. The eviction decree was restored, with limited time granted to the tenant to vacate on undertaking and compliance with rent obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>