<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 55 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4582</link>
    <description>An order refusing renewal of a Customs House Agent licence was treated as administrative, not as an adjudicating order determining a lis, so no statutory appeal lay to the Tribunal under Section 129A(a) of the Customs Act. The regulations provided only a limited representation against refusal or non-renewal, while appeal rights were expressly confined to suspension or revocation. The Tribunal also held that Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules could not be used to perpetuate a jurisdictional error or compel implementation of an earlier direction when the underlying appeal itself was not maintainable. Relief was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 55 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4582</link>
      <description>An order refusing renewal of a Customs House Agent licence was treated as administrative, not as an adjudicating order determining a lis, so no statutory appeal lay to the Tribunal under Section 129A(a) of the Customs Act. The regulations provided only a limited representation against refusal or non-renewal, while appeal rights were expressly confined to suspension or revocation. The Tribunal also held that Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules could not be used to perpetuate a jurisdictional error or compel implementation of an earlier direction when the underlying appeal itself was not maintainable. Relief was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>