<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 921 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331537</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment under section 45 of the Gujarat VAT Act is a protective measure to safeguard revenue during assessment or reassessment, but it is harsh and must be used sparingly with due care. The Court found that the petitioners&#039; estimated liability was limited and that the larger alleged liability was not shown on the material then available to be directly attributable to them. It further noted that interim protection had already reduced hardship by lifting bank account attachments and suspending the minimum stock condition, while immovable properties and the undertaking provided adequate security. The attachment was therefore sustained only over the immovable properties, with bank accounts kept released and movable properties freed subject to undertaking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 921 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331537</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment under section 45 of the Gujarat VAT Act is a protective measure to safeguard revenue during assessment or reassessment, but it is harsh and must be used sparingly with due care. The Court found that the petitioners&#039; estimated liability was limited and that the larger alleged liability was not shown on the material then available to be directly attributable to them. It further noted that interim protection had already reduced hardship by lifting bank account attachments and suspending the minimum stock condition, while immovable properties and the undertaking provided adequate security. The attachment was therefore sustained only over the immovable properties, with bank accounts kept released and movable properties freed subject to undertaking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>