<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 910 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments for A.Y. 2001-02 &amp;amp; 2002-03 due to the lack of incriminating material found during the search. Expenditure claimed by the assessee for A.Y. 2003-04 to 2007-08 was allowed by the Tribunal as reasonable. The addition of rental income in the hands of the assessee was upheld, confirming the findings of the lower authorities. The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 910 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments for A.Y. 2001-02 &amp;amp; 2002-03 due to the lack of incriminating material found during the search. Expenditure claimed by the assessee for A.Y. 2003-04 to 2007-08 was allowed by the Tribunal as reasonable. The addition of rental income in the hands of the assessee was upheld, confirming the findings of the lower authorities. The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>