<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 222 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4580</link>
    <description>The High Court Bombay dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It ruled that the power to seek review rested solely with the Adjudicating Officer, not the authority in question. Consequently, no errors or illegalities were identified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 222 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4580</link>
      <description>The High Court Bombay dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It ruled that the power to seek review rested solely with the Adjudicating Officer, not the authority in question. Consequently, no errors or illegalities were identified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>