<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 905 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstated the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 36,80,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions and the creditworthiness of the creditors, leading to the restoration of the initial addition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the final judgment pronounced on 8th July 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 905 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstated the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 36,80,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions and the creditworthiness of the creditors, leading to the restoration of the initial addition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the final judgment pronounced on 8th July 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>