<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1186 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185741</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s objections to the rejection of the request for revised returns and provide a hearing opportunity. The petitioner was instructed to appear for the hearing, with proceedings related to assessment and penalty notices put on hold. The court ordered the petitioner to provide the judgment and writ petition to the respondent for compliance, leading to the disposal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1186 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185741</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s objections to the rejection of the request for revised returns and provide a hearing opportunity. The petitioner was instructed to appear for the hearing, with proceedings related to assessment and penalty notices put on hold. The court ordered the petitioner to provide the judgment and writ petition to the respondent for compliance, leading to the disposal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>