<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1049 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185739</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai granted the application for extension of stay of recovery, citing precedents such as IPCL vs. CCE Vadodara and CCE vs. Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. The appellant was not found liable for the delay in the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:44:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1049 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185739</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai granted the application for extension of stay of recovery, citing precedents such as IPCL vs. CCE Vadodara and CCE vs. Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. The appellant was not found liable for the delay in the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>