<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 898 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the AO to delete double disallowances and reconsider certain issues based on judicial precedents. The CIT&#039;s directions under section 263 were partially upheld, with the original treatment of expenses and income classifications by the AO being affirmed. The order was pronounced on June 23, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 898 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the AO to delete double disallowances and reconsider certain issues based on judicial precedents. The CIT&#039;s directions under section 263 were partially upheld, with the original treatment of expenses and income classifications by the AO being affirmed. The order was pronounced on June 23, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>