<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (9) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185725</link>
    <description>A chartered accountant acting as a liquidator was treated as being in practice because the statutory definition of practice extended to services contemplated by regulation, including liquidation work. Misconduct in that capacity was therefore professional misconduct. The disciplinary provisions were not confined to the traditional, enumerated forms of misconduct; the statute also reached conduct that rendered a member unfit to remain in the Institute. On reference, the High Court had wide power to test the legal basis of the Council&#039;s finding and make an appropriate order or remit the matter. The result discussed was that removal from the register was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (9) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185725</link>
      <description>A chartered accountant acting as a liquidator was treated as being in practice because the statutory definition of practice extended to services contemplated by regulation, including liquidation work. Misconduct in that capacity was therefore professional misconduct. The disciplinary provisions were not confined to the traditional, enumerated forms of misconduct; the statute also reached conduct that rendered a member unfit to remain in the Institute. On reference, the High Court had wide power to test the legal basis of the Council&#039;s finding and make an appropriate order or remit the matter. The result discussed was that removal from the register was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>