<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 864 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185712</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to adjust the disallowance of sales promotion expenses, upheld the computation method of deduction under section 80HHC as per clause (baa), and accepted the change in the method of accounting for CCS and Duty Drawback as bona fide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:09:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 864 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185712</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to adjust the disallowance of sales promotion expenses, upheld the computation method of deduction under section 80HHC as per clause (baa), and accepted the change in the method of accounting for CCS and Duty Drawback as bona fide.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>