<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 892 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331508</link>
    <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the applicability of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to waste products arising during the manufacturing of dutiable final products. The appellants, manufacturers of Plywood, Flush doors, Veneers, challenged a demand and penalty imposed for clearing sawdust and wood waste/scrap without paying Excise duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand but reduced the penalty. The appellant successfully argued that waste products are not final products, and Rule 6 does not apply to waste from manufacturing dutiable final products. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 892 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331508</link>
      <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the applicability of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to waste products arising during the manufacturing of dutiable final products. The appellants, manufacturers of Plywood, Flush doors, Veneers, challenged a demand and penalty imposed for clearing sawdust and wood waste/scrap without paying Excise duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand but reduced the penalty. The appellant successfully argued that waste products are not final products, and Rule 6 does not apply to waste from manufacturing dutiable final products. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>