<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 888 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim Cenvat credit on iron and steel articles used in the fabrication of capital goods. The decision was supported by detailed evidence showing the items were component parts of machines, aligning with previous Tribunal and High Court rulings. The Revenue&#039;s argument that using the items as supporting structures disqualified the credit claim was rejected, as the evidence proved their utilization in manufacturing processes. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the established use of the articles in capital goods fabrication, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 888 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim Cenvat credit on iron and steel articles used in the fabrication of capital goods. The decision was supported by detailed evidence showing the items were component parts of machines, aligning with previous Tribunal and High Court rulings. The Revenue&#039;s argument that using the items as supporting structures disqualified the credit claim was rejected, as the evidence proved their utilization in manufacturing processes. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the established use of the articles in capital goods fabrication, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>