https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331499 The appeal was posted for maintainability regarding the demand of interest and penalty imposed on the appellant. The court confirmed a substantial amount of interest and an equal penalty for recovery. The appellants argued that a pre-deposit was not required for cases involving interest alone, but the court held that compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was necessary when both interest and penalty were disputed. The appellants were given four weeks to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, with the appeal facing dismissal if not adhered to by the specified deadline of 8th July 2016. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331499 The appeal was posted for maintainability regarding the demand of interest and penalty imposed on the appellant. The court confirmed a substantial amount of interest and an equal penalty for recovery. The appellants argued that a pre-deposit was not required for cases involving interest alone, but the court held that compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was necessary when both interest and penalty were disputed. The appellants were given four weeks to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, with the appeal facing dismissal if not adhered to by the specified deadline of 8th July 2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331499