https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331496 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the valuation of physician samples under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that the valuation method adopted by the appellant, which differentiated physician samples from medicaments meant for retail sale, was correct. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the demand raised by the Department, emphasizing the distinction between physician samples and products intended for retail sale. The decision provided clarity on the valuation of physician samples for duty payment, ensuring adherence to established legal principles and consistency in excise law application. en-us Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331496 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the valuation of physician samples under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that the valuation method adopted by the appellant, which differentiated physician samples from medicaments meant for retail sale, was correct. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the demand raised by the Department, emphasizing the distinction between physician samples and products intended for retail sale. The decision provided clarity on the valuation of physician samples for duty payment, ensuring adherence to established legal principles and consistency in excise law application. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331496