<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 879 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no malafide intent on the part of the appellant in clearing dutiable items without payment of duty under an invalid EPCG license. The penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 02/6/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:30:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 879 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no malafide intent on the part of the appellant in clearing dutiable items without payment of duty under an invalid EPCG license. The penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 02/6/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>