<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 874 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331490</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed based on the non-compliance with the time limit for issuing notices to the officers as per Sec 155 (2) of the Customs Act 1962. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and case laws in adjudication proceedings involving penalties on customs officers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 874 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331490</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed based on the non-compliance with the time limit for issuing notices to the officers as per Sec 155 (2) of the Customs Act 1962. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and case laws in adjudication proceedings involving penalties on customs officers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>