<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 867 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331483</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings in favor of the assessee regarding TDS requirements for processing fees, bank guarantee commission, and advertising hoardings. It also affirmed the deletion of interest under section 201(1A). The ITAT provided detailed analysis supporting its decision and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ensuring a fair judgment for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 867 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331483</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings in favor of the assessee regarding TDS requirements for processing fees, bank guarantee commission, and advertising hoardings. It also affirmed the deletion of interest under section 201(1A). The ITAT provided detailed analysis supporting its decision and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ensuring a fair judgment for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>