<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 861 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331477</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against excluding ANG Industries Ltd. from comparable companies in transfer pricing analysis was dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal upheld the exclusion due to functional differences, emphasizing ANG Industries&#039; diversified business activities post-restructuring, including trailer manufacturing. The decision stressed the importance of functional comparability in benchmarking international transactions, in line with Chandigarh Tribunal&#039;s principles. ANG Industries Ltd. was deemed not functionally comparable to the assessee, leading to the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissal and ANG Industries&#039; exclusion from the final set of comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 861 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331477</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against excluding ANG Industries Ltd. from comparable companies in transfer pricing analysis was dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal upheld the exclusion due to functional differences, emphasizing ANG Industries&#039; diversified business activities post-restructuring, including trailer manufacturing. The decision stressed the importance of functional comparability in benchmarking international transactions, in line with Chandigarh Tribunal&#039;s principles. ANG Industries Ltd. was deemed not functionally comparable to the assessee, leading to the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissal and ANG Industries&#039; exclusion from the final set of comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>