<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 855 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the disallowance under section 14A as not pressed, allowed the additional grounds rejection appeal, ruled that section 115JB does not apply to the electricity company, and therefore, the issue of adding disallowance under section 14A to book profits was irrelevant. The appeal was partly allowed, with the order pronounced on May 4, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:01:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 855 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the disallowance under section 14A as not pressed, allowed the additional grounds rejection appeal, ruled that section 115JB does not apply to the electricity company, and therefore, the issue of adding disallowance under section 14A to book profits was irrelevant. The appeal was partly allowed, with the order pronounced on May 4, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>