<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 880 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the assessment orders invalid under section 143(3) r/w section 153A due to lack of incriminating material post-search, leading to unjustified disallowances. The direction for a special audit under section 142(2A) was found unjustified and time-barred. Disallowances of various expenses were set aside as excessive and unsupported. The mandatory levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C required no separate adjudication. Assessment orders under section 143(3) r/w section 153C were also deemed invalid, with penalties under section 271(B) canceled. All appeals by the assessee were allowed, emphasizing procedural fairness and objective assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 880 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the assessment orders invalid under section 143(3) r/w section 153A due to lack of incriminating material post-search, leading to unjustified disallowances. The direction for a special audit under section 142(2A) was found unjustified and time-barred. Disallowances of various expenses were set aside as excessive and unsupported. The mandatory levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C required no separate adjudication. Assessment orders under section 143(3) r/w section 153C were also deemed invalid, with penalties under section 271(B) canceled. All appeals by the assessee were allowed, emphasizing procedural fairness and objective assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>