<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185700</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the orders related to penalty enhancement and restoration of the appeal, directing the restoration of all four appeals subject to a cost deposit of Rs. 10,000 within two weeks. The Court emphasized the lack of fair representation for the Petitioners during the penalty enhancement proceedings and instructed the CESTAT to hear the appeals strictly on their merits and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:58:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185700</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the orders related to penalty enhancement and restoration of the appeal, directing the restoration of all four appeals subject to a cost deposit of Rs. 10,000 within two weeks. The Court emphasized the lack of fair representation for the Petitioners during the penalty enhancement proceedings and instructed the CESTAT to hear the appeals strictly on their merits and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>