<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1039 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 23,42,010/- imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, as the AO failed to conclusively establish whether the assessee was guilty of concealing income or providing inaccurate particulars. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal found the AO&#039;s decision ambiguous, leading to a legal error. Consequently, the penalty was deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1039 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 23,42,010/- imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, as the AO failed to conclusively establish whether the assessee was guilty of concealing income or providing inaccurate particulars. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal found the AO&#039;s decision ambiguous, leading to a legal error. Consequently, the penalty was deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>