<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 848 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331464</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties under Sections 77 and 78 due to the established reasonable cause for the failure to pay service tax. The demand for service tax and interest was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 848 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331464</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties under Sections 77 and 78 due to the established reasonable cause for the failure to pay service tax. The demand for service tax and interest was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>