https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185693 Protection under section 9 of the Tamil Nadu City Tenants' Protection Act, 1922 was available only for a tenant of vacant land, not for a building with appurtenant land. On a reading of the lease deed as a whole, the Court found a single composite lease with one rent, one term and renewal arrangement, and clauses showing that the open space was incidental to enjoyment of the existing building. The land was therefore appurtenant to the building and not separately demised as vacant land. The contention that the deed created two distinct leases was rejected, and the application to purchase the land was held not maintainable. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185693 Protection under section 9 of the Tamil Nadu City Tenants' Protection Act, 1922 was available only for a tenant of vacant land, not for a building with appurtenant land. On a reading of the lease deed as a whole, the Court found a single composite lease with one rent, one term and renewal arrangement, and clauses showing that the open space was incidental to enjoyment of the existing building. The land was therefore appurtenant to the building and not separately demised as vacant land. The contention that the deed created two distinct leases was rejected, and the application to purchase the land was held not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185693