<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (9) TMI 59 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185685</link>
    <description>A capital gain requires a transfer, sale or exchange of a capital asset; a mere transfer of management of coal mines to another concern was not such a transfer, so the disputed receipt could not be taxed as capital gain. The text also notes that an appellate tribunal is confined to the subject-matter of the appeal as raised by the parties and cannot, on its own motion, treat the same receipt as income on a new basis that was neither appealed against nor cross-objected to. The reference was answered against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (9) TMI 59 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185685</link>
      <description>A capital gain requires a transfer, sale or exchange of a capital asset; a mere transfer of management of coal mines to another concern was not such a transfer, so the disputed receipt could not be taxed as capital gain. The text also notes that an appellate tribunal is confined to the subject-matter of the appeal as raised by the parties and cannot, on its own motion, treat the same receipt as income on a new basis that was neither appealed against nor cross-objected to. The reference was answered against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>