https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4562 On a prima facie reading of the explanation inserted in Sl. No. 7 of Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. dated 01.03.2006, the value of goods supplied and provided by the assessee's client could not be included for the purpose urged by the respondents. The Court found the respondents' insistence on such inclusion to be inconsistent with the notification's explanation. Interim relief was therefore granted as prayed for, and notice was directed to be issued. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4562 On a prima facie reading of the explanation inserted in Sl. No. 7 of Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. dated 01.03.2006, the value of goods supplied and provided by the assessee's client could not be included for the purpose urged by the respondents. The Court found the respondents' insistence on such inclusion to be inconsistent with the notification's explanation. Interim relief was therefore granted as prayed for, and notice was directed to be issued. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4562