<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 846 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal related to the denial of Cenvat credit in full. For the second appeal, credits were partially allowed but demand on the ineligible amount was upheld with interest. Penalties were set aside due to lack of clarity on credit eligibility. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 846 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal related to the denial of Cenvat credit in full. For the second appeal, credits were partially allowed but demand on the ineligible amount was upheld with interest. Penalties were set aside due to lack of clarity on credit eligibility. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>