https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331456 The Tribunal held that the amendment to Rule 2(k) of CCR did not have retrospective effect and the demand was barred by limitation due to the Department's prior knowledge of the issue. The Department's appeal was dismissed on both merits and limitation grounds. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:09:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331456 The Tribunal held that the amendment to Rule 2(k) of CCR did not have retrospective effect and the demand was barred by limitation due to the Department's prior knowledge of the issue. The Department's appeal was dismissed on both merits and limitation grounds. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331456