<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 836 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication. The Principal Commissioner was directed to comply with Section 9D of the Act and follow the procedure outlined by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in Ambika International, which includes examining witnesses in chief, providing examination records to the appellant, and allowing cross-examination if requested. The appeal was disposed of with directions to the Principal Commissioner to adjudicate the Show Cause Notice following the mandate of Section 9D and the directions in para 33 of the Ambika International judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 836 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication. The Principal Commissioner was directed to comply with Section 9D of the Act and follow the procedure outlined by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in Ambika International, which includes examining witnesses in chief, providing examination records to the appellant, and allowing cross-examination if requested. The appeal was disposed of with directions to the Principal Commissioner to adjudicate the Show Cause Notice following the mandate of Section 9D and the directions in para 33 of the Ambika International judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>