<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 835 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331451</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods written off in the books was held not recoverable where there was no allegation that the goods remained unused or were removed from the factory, so mere book write-off did not justify reversal. Credit taken before receipt of inputs was also found unsustainable for demand purposes because no finding showed that the inputs were never received; timing alone was insufficient. Duty on durable and returnable packaging was likewise disallowed, as no additional consideration for the packaging was proved and duty had already been discharged on the transaction value. The impugned order was set aside in entirety, with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 835 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331451</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods written off in the books was held not recoverable where there was no allegation that the goods remained unused or were removed from the factory, so mere book write-off did not justify reversal. Credit taken before receipt of inputs was also found unsustainable for demand purposes because no finding showed that the inputs were never received; timing alone was insufficient. Duty on durable and returnable packaging was likewise disallowed, as no additional consideration for the packaging was proved and duty had already been discharged on the transaction value. The impugned order was set aside in entirety, with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>