https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331450 Supply made to DMRC was held outside Rule 6(6)(vii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, so the appellant was required to pay the prescribed amount within time, which was admittedly not done. That contravention attracted penal consequences under Rule 15(1), and penalty was therefore sustainable in principle. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the authorities' penalty was found excessive and the quantum was reduced while liability to penalty was maintained. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331450 Supply made to DMRC was held outside Rule 6(6)(vii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, so the appellant was required to pay the prescribed amount within time, which was admittedly not done. That contravention attracted penal consequences under Rule 15(1), and penalty was therefore sustainable in principle. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the authorities' penalty was found excessive and the quantum was reduced while liability to penalty was maintained. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331450