https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331448 The Court upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty, emphasizing the availability of the CESTAT appeal as the proper remedy despite the backlog of cases. It ruled that the pendency of matters in CESTAT did not justify bypassing statutory procedures. The judgment stressed the importance of following prescribed legal processes and exhausting available remedies before seeking judicial intervention, ultimately dismissing the petitions and applications challenging the final notification. en-us Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331448 The Court upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty, emphasizing the availability of the CESTAT appeal as the proper remedy despite the backlog of cases. It ruled that the pendency of matters in CESTAT did not justify bypassing statutory procedures. The judgment stressed the importance of following prescribed legal processes and exhausting available remedies before seeking judicial intervention, ultimately dismissing the petitions and applications challenging the final notification. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331448