https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4558 The HC stayed recovery proceedings under section 220(6) where the assessee's income was enhanced from Rs. 7.5 cr to Rs. 58.68 cr. Despite the assessee filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and a stay application before the AO, the department initiated recovery proceedings for demand, interest and penalty. The HC found this premature, ordering recovery proceedings to be kept in abeyance and allowing partial deposit as per the earlier DCIT order. en-us Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 May 2025 13:12:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4558 The HC stayed recovery proceedings under section 220(6) where the assessee's income was enhanced from Rs. 7.5 cr to Rs. 58.68 cr. Despite the assessee filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and a stay application before the AO, the department initiated recovery proceedings for demand, interest and penalty. The HC found this premature, ordering recovery proceedings to be kept in abeyance and allowing partial deposit as per the earlier DCIT order. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4558