https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331440 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the respondent Corporation cannot levy property tax on Union-owned buildings. Any property tax collected must be refunded, while the Union is bound to pay the agreed service charges. The judgment reaffirmed the constitutional exemption of Union properties from state taxes and upheld the legal distinction between property tax and service charges. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331440 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the respondent Corporation cannot levy property tax on Union-owned buildings. Any property tax collected must be refunded, while the Union is bound to pay the agreed service charges. The judgment reaffirmed the constitutional exemption of Union properties from state taxes and upheld the legal distinction between property tax and service charges. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331440