<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331434</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the appellant/assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D and allowing the deduction under section 80G. The ITAT emphasized the importance of conclusive evidence in tax matters and referenced relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331434</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the appellant/assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D and allowing the deduction under section 80G. The ITAT emphasized the importance of conclusive evidence in tax matters and referenced relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>