<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 811 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331427</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with several issues remanded back to the AO or TPO for fresh consideration and verification. The Tribunal directed the AO and TPO to follow specific guidelines and judicial precedents in their reassessment. The judgment emphasized the need for proper verification and adherence to established legal principles in determining tax liabilities and allowable deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 811 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331427</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with several issues remanded back to the AO or TPO for fresh consideration and verification. The Tribunal directed the AO and TPO to follow specific guidelines and judicial precedents in their reassessment. The judgment emphasized the need for proper verification and adherence to established legal principles in determining tax liabilities and allowable deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>