<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 810 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under Section 271D. The assessee demonstrated a reasonable cause for the cash transactions, with the explanation accepted during assessment proceedings. The initiation of penalty proceedings was found to be within the permissible period, and the Revenue was barred from taking a contradictory stance in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 810 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under Section 271D. The assessee demonstrated a reasonable cause for the cash transactions, with the explanation accepted during assessment proceedings. The initiation of penalty proceedings was found to be within the permissible period, and the Revenue was barred from taking a contradictory stance in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>