https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185647 The Tribunal found a prima facie case in favor of the appellant against the demand related to services rendered to SEZ units but did not find a prima facie case for the demand for CENVAT credit availed on input services. The appellant's limitation plea against the demands was not accepted as the material facts were not adequately disclosed. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit a specified amount within six weeks. Compliance would lead to a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning penalties and demands in the case. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:01:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185647 The Tribunal found a prima facie case in favor of the appellant against the demand related to services rendered to SEZ units but did not find a prima facie case for the demand for CENVAT credit availed on input services. The appellant's limitation plea against the demands was not accepted as the material facts were not adequately disclosed. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit a specified amount within six weeks. Compliance would lead to a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning penalties and demands in the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185647