<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 711 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185639</link>
    <description>A statutory service-regulation scheme does not oust industrial forum jurisdiction unless exclusion is express or necessarily implied; industrial remedies remain available where they are not inconsistent with the governing Act and rules. A Development Officer was treated as a workman, and the Industrial Tribunal could reappraise dismissal to test whether the punishment was disproportionate to the proved misconduct. Negligence alone, on the facts noted, was insufficient to sustain the harshest penalty where there was no deliberate or grave misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 711 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185639</link>
      <description>A statutory service-regulation scheme does not oust industrial forum jurisdiction unless exclusion is express or necessarily implied; industrial remedies remain available where they are not inconsistent with the governing Act and rules. A Development Officer was treated as a workman, and the Industrial Tribunal could reappraise dismissal to test whether the punishment was disproportionate to the proved misconduct. Negligence alone, on the facts noted, was insufficient to sustain the harshest penalty where there was no deliberate or grave misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>