<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 794 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the service tax appeals to have been filed within time and considered the stay applications on that basis. It noted an earlier stay order in the appellants&#039; own case for an earlier period, and observed that the dispute appeared debatable, at least from the amendment effective 01.05.2011. However, the appellants accepted that they had no strong case on two identified demands, so the Tribunal granted stay of recovery of the remaining demands subject to a partial pre-deposit of 50% of the disputed amount within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 794 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the service tax appeals to have been filed within time and considered the stay applications on that basis. It noted an earlier stay order in the appellants&#039; own case for an earlier period, and observed that the dispute appeared debatable, at least from the amendment effective 01.05.2011. However, the appellants accepted that they had no strong case on two identified demands, so the Tribunal granted stay of recovery of the remaining demands subject to a partial pre-deposit of 50% of the disputed amount within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>