<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 126 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of rectification of the Bill of Entry under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, for imported goods where the correct duty rate was sought to be adjusted post-payment without challenging the assessment through an appeal. Citing legal precedents, including the decision in Priya Blue Industries, the Tribunal emphasized that Section 154 only permits rectification of clerical or mathematical errors and not post-assessment modifications. The appellant&#039;s reliance on a previous Kerala High Court judgment was dismissed in light of established legal principles, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 126 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of rectification of the Bill of Entry under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, for imported goods where the correct duty rate was sought to be adjusted post-payment without challenging the assessment through an appeal. Citing legal precedents, including the decision in Priya Blue Industries, the Tribunal emphasized that Section 154 only permits rectification of clerical or mathematical errors and not post-assessment modifications. The appellant&#039;s reliance on a previous Kerala High Court judgment was dismissed in light of established legal principles, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>