<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 787 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331403</link>
    <description>The denial of Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 15,84,550 to the appellant was overturned as the court found insufficient evidence to support the denial based solely on investigations at the manufacturer&#039;s end. Despite circumstantial evidence suggesting irregularities at the manufacturer&#039;s premises, there was a lack of proof that the excess cleared defective rounds were actually received by the appellant. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 787 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331403</link>
      <description>The denial of Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 15,84,550 to the appellant was overturned as the court found insufficient evidence to support the denial based solely on investigations at the manufacturer&#039;s end. Despite circumstantial evidence suggesting irregularities at the manufacturer&#039;s premises, there was a lack of proof that the excess cleared defective rounds were actually received by the appellant. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>