<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 786 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the excisability of &quot;Dolochar.&quot; Previous judgments by the Supreme Court and Tribunal had definitively settled the classification of &quot;Dolochar,&quot; which the Commissioner failed to consider. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was no longer open to debate and overturned the decision, highlighting the Commissioner&#039;s disregard for established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 786 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the excisability of &quot;Dolochar.&quot; Previous judgments by the Supreme Court and Tribunal had definitively settled the classification of &quot;Dolochar,&quot; which the Commissioner failed to consider. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was no longer open to debate and overturned the decision, highlighting the Commissioner&#039;s disregard for established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>