<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 778 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for recovery of irregularly availed credit but upheld the confirmation of interest and penalty imposed by the original authority. The decision emphasized procedural compliance and intent in availing CENVAT Credit, noting the rectification of errors and payment of penalties as compensatory measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 778 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for recovery of irregularly availed credit but upheld the confirmation of interest and penalty imposed by the original authority. The decision emphasized procedural compliance and intent in availing CENVAT Credit, noting the rectification of errors and payment of penalties as compensatory measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>