<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1557 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185628</link>
    <description>Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was waived where reasonable cause existed for delayed payment of service tax, and Section 80 was applied to grant relief. The Commissioner (Appeals) found sufficient cause for the delay and set aside the penalty. That exercise of discretion was found free from infirmity, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not displace the basis for waiver. The penalty relief was therefore upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1557 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185628</link>
      <description>Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was waived where reasonable cause existed for delayed payment of service tax, and Section 80 was applied to grant relief. The Commissioner (Appeals) found sufficient cause for the delay and set aside the penalty. That exercise of discretion was found free from infirmity, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not displace the basis for waiver. The penalty relief was therefore upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>