<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 760 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order on both issues. The deletions of the disallowances totaling Rs. 1,12,08,805/- were justified due to the genuineness of the transactions, absence of tax evasion, and adherence to judicial precedents. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowances cannot be made based on assumptions without contrary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 760 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order on both issues. The deletions of the disallowances totaling Rs. 1,12,08,805/- were justified due to the genuineness of the transactions, absence of tax evasion, and adherence to judicial precedents. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowances cannot be made based on assumptions without contrary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>